Відео

Great video, lots to think about. In 2008 I got interested in climate change, firstly to understand it, then to try and solve it. But no one can do that alone, so I would add that effective collaboration with others is what is needed for breakthrough accomplishment.

Thankyou so much!😀

What is your level in your opinion? 🤔

So when one has life experience through which they have come to a hypothesis about some fundamental principles, which they believe helps them apply them successfully but they are unable to explain and therefore share the concept and processes to others then what are they on the thinking level?

Learning this in my postgraduate studies lol. Currently this is the way I have to approve my thesis, and basically my scientific career. Much truth to this. I wish I followed this earlier in life though.

I would love to see a further explanation on this subject. I never had a mental framework that worked for me to understand if i was over or underthinking a problem. Exposure to Bloom's hierarchy of learning has been a little building block in my learning journey, and I'd like to fortify it.

Absolutely!!!

is it just me who unknowingly thinks at lvl 6!?!??!??!

Great video! A method I was taught as a stubborn learner by my uncle when I was giving up on high school decades ago, was to dwell less on memorization of material. Instead, understand where and how to find the resources. As things have progressed technologically over the past 30 years, this technique has become increasingly useful, and second nature. We've had Google for quite awhile, as well as UA-cam. These are awesome resources that aid in Level 4 thinking. Analysis by 'contrast and compare' has become second nature to many. ChatGPT and AI are opening further paths to Level 4 and 5 thinking, as you have shown here. This video will remain valuable to me, thanks for posting!

7:22

Level 6 is usually called conspiracy theorising 😝

What a great video! I think the problem with previous ways of teaching is that they're very subject-oriented. Even though you're learning these subjects as stepping stones for your ultimate goal (to become a doctor), you are taught like you would become a biochemist or anatomist. Don't even start about Citric Acid Cycles, steps of DNA transcription and translation which you could easily look up on the internet. Now that I'm re-learning those again for PG exams, I can clearly see how I wasted my undergrad years trying to memorize these with stupid mnemonics! LOL You don't even need that much info to become a good doctor. I hope med students learn from this video, but I was a med student once, and I didn't learn though I saw similar advices.

Ahhhh Nietzsche would thank you very much , sir.

A master of learning who didn't mention how the brain works? Non of these "levels" mean jack shit if you aren't able to regulate yourself, which is why many students fail, not because they don't do the "right thinking", but they can't access higher level thinking, which is part of what makes the human brain unique. You will become a master at something if you are able to focus and keep calm, and not let stress and fear of failing prevent you. First you need to understand that the brain operates from a button down approach, meaning it first needs to take care the primitive functions such as oxygen, hydration, safety, dangers, imagined and real. This sort of gimmicky ideas he promotes has a certain appeal to insecure people who don't understand what they want or how their emotions work. However, if you want to understand why aren't reaching "high levels" maybe do some research on the neuro sequential model, or any models of the brain that also looks at the entire brain, not just the neocortex, which people who are constantly stressed have trouble accessing on the first place.

Broken

In my life you became now most valuable person

Aantekeningen: - Denkniveau kan alleen introspectief afgeleid worden - Analyse is een gevorderde versie van toepassen: Het verschil is het aantal gebruikte concepten en de complexiteit van het probleem. - Vanaf niveau 4 vergt denken buitengewoon veel mentale inspanning: Stof doorlopen gaat langzamer. - Analyse, het onderscheiden van overeenkomsten, verschillen en relaties tussen concepten, geeft meer inzicht in de essentie van concepten. - Bloom's taxonomie is erg invloedrijk in de manier van universitair testen - Des te beter je kan denken op hoog niveau (5 & 6), des te mentaal zelfstandiger je bent - Start met leren op hoog denkniveau vanwege het doorsijpelingseffect

Biorisk mitigation mitigation is the action and control taken to reduce and eliminate risk associated with biological agents. It is als imprtant to perform a risk assessment test before choosing a mitigation as it helps select the right mitigation control, prevent waste f resources and also help t adress ris properlly. mitigation control measure include Eliminatn and substitution, engineering control, administrative control, practice and procedure, personal protective equipment . Relying on just one of these contrls cannot fully control dangers as each has its advantages and disadvantages. Exercise. Driving a car is safer than riding a bike as it offers more protection to risk and dangers. Thank you ma.

One day I also became like you Dr .Karan Yadav Love from India ❤

Since a few years I learn with Anki. And for me it works quite good. But I thinking about now where Anki fits into this structure?!

Dk How do I put it across nicely, Pronunciation of words like 'or' 'more' is super irritating , cudnt concentrate

Realising this too late,not being able to make perfect notes made me procrastinate, for the whole semester and now it's only 3 days to go for exams and here i am😢

I think this is why I could never study properly,i always wanted to not make any mistakes,and end up procrastinating for days on end,it never helps,but the only useful thing are the scribbles i prepare when it's 2 days before the exams🤧

Yooo so I'm level 6? Didn't see that coming.

Turns out I outright refused the first level at the uni. The whole lecture system is absurd and misanthropic to the highest degree.

Frustratingly my mind is more naturally drawn to higher order thinking but can't spend more than about 10 minutes doing the lower order stuff to actually learn the subjects.

Your presentation is logical and well explained. Thanks.

A retired school teacher from England explained this to me many years ago but I've never seen it in print. Now I found a 15 minute UA-cam video that makes the same point. This is why the American educational system is failing so badly...

“creation of an answer you don’t think exists” now that’s a hidden gem

Level 7 is wisdom which goes beyond knowledge. Btw I think rote learning is the most important skill. It is the best way to exercise the mind.

what i have understood is that I am a level 5 thinker but, I don't go through to the end and make conclusions/ produce results and just give up mid way because its not that simple, and hence i have not had good academic results.

i think at level 69

As an ex-product manager who is now teaching communication and PM skills, I realized that a lot of the PM skills to be able to properly categorize and prioritize work is essentially helping the team do the heavy lifting - the level 4/5 thinking for the team at the project level. An entrepreneur is usually thinking at the 4-6 levels in order to create something new.

How am i able to think at level 4 and 5 and still fail advanced

So basically I stopped at level 3 because I'm too lazy 💀well still got an A tho

anyone here knows whats happening with gen z?

It does not go from level to level from the bottom to the top or from near the top to the bottom of a TRIANGLE OR PYRAMID. It is also erroneous to call Level 6 (whatever!) the Genius level - going by how Genius is generally understood. One can be a Genius at Analysis separate from being a Genius at Evaluation (which might result from Analysis or even 'seemingly' without it)

So… what do I need to do? As an electrical engineer. This is all so macroscale and I have no idea from the video to apply to it to my studies

Thanks for such great video!!

I think I'm around level 4

I am a surgeon of 25 years experience and reasonably famous in my field in my region. I am in a level of creating new technique to suit patients, and able to combined patient perception of disease/ past experience to formulate a plan. Sometimes I am also able to undermine underlying motivation and demotivation. Takes lots of practice. The problem in medical school is u need to perform within certain period. Medicine is lifelong learning. Be humble. Patients is always our teacher. Same disease manifest differently in different patients. Keep a keen observation and keep an open mind. I dare not teach medical students because my management is not that text book but it works. Also one more tips: ur grade in medical school is not that important. Those of us who do well in future career are actually medical students with mediocre grades

Im really loving this channel. Makes complete sense, I try and teach level 4/5 as a lecturer but not many of my students are ready to think that way, perhaps partly because I am not teaching a very high level course and often over deliver what is required. I really love sitting down with myself and trying to design a new way to explore and come up with a hypothesis on a new idea though, something I wish I had the time to do constantly. Having thought deeply about certain topics, this all makes complete sense and is very helpful to know the mechanisms in action.

I'm your biggest fan sir

What has happened in computer science is that AI and different frameworks have all but eliminated the need to code solutions. So I tell young people today that you will need at least a master's in data science or AI to get employment. So, level 5 and 6 thinking is critical for long-term career success.

There is an issue with the uniformity of such intellectual models, and it appears to stem from the inquiring subject's own expectations of what kinds of problems they are anticipating within the system. Because there is the academic assumption that there is only one kind of knowledge, it follows that there must be only one kind of intelligence and one universal standard of evaluation and measurement, ie: solving problems. To concieve that tbere are six 'levels' of thinking that can occur simultaneously to solve problems for example, 'sets up" the subject to approach thinking in terms of an involuntary response to the pending challenge only. I always thought it was strange to refer to mathematical calculations as solving 'math problems'. We never refer to completing a PHD, learning to speak a new language or passing a driver"s test as amending linguistic phonetic problems, or solving vehicular operations problems. And yet all such systems of examination and scrutiny are themselves framed as broken images that must be repaired. The chaotic piles of puzzle pieces from a vast jig-saw. And so the kind of mind that developes and the neural pathways it forges are those of perpetual problem solving. IQ tests, apptitude tests, multiple choice, they all measure and engender the same busy breed of ant, scurrying around, solving riddles for the hive.

This seems like something I kinda got from starting each course by understanding what it is about, rather than diving straight into details on the first chapter. However, there are a few elements left out that can hinder people. IQ is not fixed or has a general level for most people. Som will just struggle more than others. Having these levels to think about will help, but some schools and courses may have just too much material which is meant to be consumed in too little time. And figuring out how to learn the best possible way and enough, might not be possible for all. talking from personal experience here. I found that if I got more time on certain subjects I could easily beat the grades of the ones who did it within the time limit. they might do the same and even better than me with more time, but there were many times especially the last year of school when I though that this was just insane. I won't be good at anything at this speed. The first year had many straight-A students, but it rapidly declined in the second year. So the conclusion is that many can learn, but is the system meant for everyone?

So interesting and useful. Thank you very much for sharing 🙏

A golden share!

Using level 6 to evaluate this video I have come up with level 7 which is Synthesizing multidisciplinary knowledge, find a cross-over in two or more fields of knowledge, to construct a set of solutions to an ultra complex real world problem. For example make rockets reusable, economics + physics.

Can I use your content to create infographic ?